• 《工程索引》(EI)刊源期刊
    • 中文核心期刊
    • 中國科技論文統計源期刊
    • 中國科學引文數據庫來源期刊

    留言板

    尊敬的讀者、作者、審稿人, 關于本刊的投稿、審稿、編輯和出版的任何問題, 您可以本頁添加留言。我們將盡快給您答復。謝謝您的支持!

    姓名
    郵箱
    手機號碼
    標題
    留言內容
    驗證碼

    結合多尺度分割和隨機森林的變質礦物提取

    唐淑蘭 孟勇 王國強 卜濤

    唐淑蘭, 孟勇, 王國強, 卜濤. 結合多尺度分割和隨機森林的變質礦物提取[J]. 工程科學學報, 2022, 44(2): 170-179. doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2020.09.08.004
    引用本文: 唐淑蘭, 孟勇, 王國強, 卜濤. 結合多尺度分割和隨機森林的變質礦物提取[J]. 工程科學學報, 2022, 44(2): 170-179. doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2020.09.08.004
    TANG Shu-lan, MENG Yong, WANG Guo-qiang, BU Tao. Extraction of metamorphic minerals by multiscale segmentation combined with random forest[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2022, 44(2): 170-179. doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2020.09.08.004
    Citation: TANG Shu-lan, MENG Yong, WANG Guo-qiang, BU Tao. Extraction of metamorphic minerals by multiscale segmentation combined with random forest[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2022, 44(2): 170-179. doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2020.09.08.004

    結合多尺度分割和隨機森林的變質礦物提取

    doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2020.09.08.004
    基金項目: 中國地質調查局資助項目(DD20179403,DD20190364,DD20190812);西安財經大學科學研究扶持計劃資助項目(21FCJH008);陜西省自然科學基礎研究計劃資助項目(2020JM-585)
    詳細信息
      通訊作者:

      E-mail:16392800@qq.com

    Extraction of metamorphic minerals by multiscale segmentation combined with random forest

    More Information
    • 摘要: 為提高遙感影像變質礦物提取精度,提升變質帶的識別效果,以甘肅北山ASTER影像為研究區,結合了比值運算、多尺度分割、隨機森林分類法進行變質礦物提取。首先,通過礦物特征性光譜特征構造比值運算公式、進行影像增強;然后,對增強影像進行基于光譜及變差函數的多尺度分割;接著,采用隨機森林法提取目標礦物;最后,通過野外勘查、采樣、薄片鑒定進行精度評價。結果表明,黑云母、白云母、角閃石在ASTER影像上具有鑒定性特征,提取精度分別為85.4088%、84.7640%和85.7308%;其他含量較少的變質礦物提取精度可達到60%以上。多尺度分割能充分利用礦物的叢集特征;變差函數紋理能增強形態特征對礦物的區分能力;隨機森林分類法對礦物混合引起的噪聲不敏感、提取結果穩定。

       

    • 圖  1  研究區地質簡圖

      Figure  1.  Geological sketch of the study area

      圖  2  標志性礦物反射率曲線

      Figure  2.  Reflectance curve of marker minerals

      圖  3  技術流程

      Figure  3.  Technical process

      圖  4  比值增強結果。(a)Bi;(b)Mus;(c)Am;(d)Chl;(e)Gt;(f)Act

      Figure  4.  Ratio enhancement results: (a) Bi; (b) Mus; (c) Am; (d) Chl; (e) Gt; (f) Act

      圖  5  多尺度分割流程

      Figure  5.  Multiscale segmentation process

      圖  6  GS值變化趨勢

      Figure  6.  Change trend of GS values

      圖  7  多尺度分割結果。(a)Bi;(b)Mus;(c)Am;(d)Chl;(e)Gt;(f)Act

      Figure  7.  Multiscale segmentation results: (a) Bi; (b) Mus; (c) Am; (d) Chl; (e) Gt; (f) Act

      圖  8  特征重要程度排名

      Figure  8.  Ranking of feature importance

      圖  9  決策樹個數選擇

      Figure  9.  Number selection of decision trees

      圖  10  礦物提取結果。(a)Bi;(b)Mus;(c)Am;(d)Chl;(e)Gt;(f)Act

      Figure  10.  Mineral extraction results: (a) Bi; (b) Mus; (c) Am; (d) Chl; (e) Gt; and (f) Act

      圖  11  部分樣品顯微照片。(a)云母石英片巖;(b)石榴石白云母斜長片麻巖;(c)蛇紋石透輝石白云質大理巖;(d)鈉長石綠泥石石英千枚巖

      Figure  11.  Micrograph of some samples: (a) mica quartz schist; (b) garnet muscovite plagioclase gneiss; (c) serpentine diopside dolomitic marble; (d) albite chlorite quartz phyllite

      Q—Quartz;Pl—Plagioclase;Kf—K-feldspar;Ser—Sericite;Am—Amphibole;Bi—Biotite;Di—Diopside;Act—Actinolite;Serp—Serpentine,Cc—Carbonate minerals;Mus—Muscovite;Gt—Garnet;Chl—Chlorite;Ep—Epidote

      表  1  礦物的吸收譜帶與ASTER波段的對應關系

      Table  1.   Correspondence relation between the absorption bands of the minerals and ASTER bands

      MineralASTER band
      15678910111213
      BiReflexAbsorptionReflex
      MusAbsorptionReflexAbsorptionReflex
      AmReflexAbsorptionReflex
      ChlAbsorptionReflexAbsorptionReflex
      GtAbsorptionReflex
      ActReflexAbsorptionReflex
      下載: 導出CSV

      表  2  各礦物比值公式

      Table  2.   Ratio formula of minerals

      BiMusAmChlGtAct
      (b12+b10)/b11(b5+b7)/b6(b6+b9)/(b8+b7)(b1+b9)/b8b13/b12(b6+ b9)/b8
      下載: 導出CSV

      表  3  礦物樣本數

      Table  3.   Mineral samples

      BiMusAmChlGtAct
      1577134819451403912832
      下載: 導出CSV

      表  4  不同特征數量礦物提取精度

      Table  4.   Extraction precision of minerals with different characteristic numbers

      FeaturesExtraction precision/%
      BiMusAmChlGtAct
      180.004175.121272.375566.005264.656460.0027
      282.342176.234275.113767.231165.003360.0456
      383.030276.780276.023267.612167.911160.0101
      483.001276.876775.354567.568965.588960.01
      582.463276.206975.118266.786565.342160.0043
      681.879576.195174.114766.001165.00159.9876
      780.78976.002273.243365.504564.776859.3425
      879.657475.546772.138964.867564.334559.0001
      978.675974.345271.351163.786562.997658.3456
      下載: 導出CSV

      表  5  部分樣品薄片鑒定結果

      Table  5.   Identification results of some sample slices

      Sample numberSampling locationLithologyMineral composition
      LongitudeLatitude
      D015896°32′13.1″41°59′41.4″Albite epidote chlorite schistQuartz 48%,Feldspar 25%,Chlorite 12%,Epidote 8%,
      Biotite 3%,Sphene 3%
      D012696°32′53.1″41°59′20.4″Plagioclase amphiboliteAmphibole 75%,Plagioclase 15%,Quartz 5%,Carbonate minerals 4%,Opaque minerals 1%
      D012396°32′56.6″41°59′19.5″Garnet muscovite plagioclase gneissMuscovite 30%,Feldspar 62%,Quartz 5%,Garnet 3%
      D012196°32′57.6″41°59′19.3″Biotite plagioclase gneissQuartz 45%,Plagioclase 33%,Biotite 20%,Amphibole 2%
      D011796°33′8.2″41°59′17.8″Biotite plagioclase gneissQuartz 28%,Plagioclase 25%,Biotite 25%,Chlorite 15%,
      K-feldspar 5%,Opaque minerals 2%
      D010796°33′16.8″41°59′7.5″TonaliteQuartz 42%,Feldspar 34%,Biotite 12%,Amphibole 8%,Carbonate minerals 2%,Sericite 2%
      D010596°33′16.6″41°59′4″Garnet biotite plagioclase gneissQuartz 50%,Feldspar 31%,Biotite 10%,Garnet 5%,
      Opaque minerals 3%,Apatite 1%
      D010396°33′16.3″41°59′3″Garnet biotite plagioclase gneissQuartz 40%,Plagioclase 30%,K-feldspar 7%,Biotite 12%,Garnet 3%
      D112596°31′36.8″41°57′24.3″Serpentine diopside dolomitic marbleCalcite 49%,Diopside 32%,Serpentine 14%,Actinolite 5%
      D090196°40′47.7″41°55′39.2″Albite chlorite quartz phylliteQuartz 32%,Plagioclase 16%,Chlorite 48%,Epidote 4%,Sphene
      D042096°34′35.6″41°52′36.5″Plagioclase amphibolitePlagioclase 55%,Amphibole 30%,Quartz 10%,Biotite 3%,Epidote 2%
      D042696°34′34.5″41°52′29″Mica quartz schistQuartz 50%,Muscovite 30%,Biotite 20%
      D045096°34′14.9″41°51′38.6″Plagioclase hornblende gneissPlagioclase 35%,Amphibole 55%,Epidote 5%,Quartz 5%
      D100796°30′44.9″41°50′45.1″Mica monzonite gneissK-feldspar 30%,Plagioclase 25%,Quartz 27%,
      Biotite 14%,Muscovite 4%
      D005596°33′49″41°50′6.3″Biotite plagioclase gneissPlagioclase 38%,Quartz 35%,Biotite 20%,Muscovite 3%,Chlorite 4%
      D011396°34′19.3″41°51′46″Plagioclase hornblende gneissAmphibole 45%,Albite 37%,Microcline 10%,Quartz 5%,Pyroxene 2%,Opaque minerals 1%
      下載: 導出CSV

      表  6  精度評價

      Table  6.   Accuracy evaluation

      MineralPA/%UA/%OA/%Kappa
      Bi80.9578.6485.40880.7779
      Mus83.3575.6084.76400.7833
      Am79.7477.5585.73080.7748
      Chl68.7463.7670.69330.5938
      Gt58.4258.4365.59920.5462
      Act59.6164.4166.75090.5560
      下載: 導出CSV

      表  7  本文方法與其他方法提取精度對比

      Table  7.   Comparison of extraction accuracy between the present method and other methods

      MineralExtraction accuracy/%
      Ratio + threshold
      segmentation
      Ratio +SVMMethod of
      this paper
      Bi77.354681.134185.4088
      Mus81.283082.987084.7640
      Am76.968481.100285.7308
      Chl64.659466.453270.6933
      Gt61.842263.188665.5992
      Act62.784764.235166.7509
      下載: 導出CSV
      中文字幕在线观看
    • [1] Diener J F A, White R W, Link K, et al. Clockwise, low-P metamorphism of the Aus qranulite terrain, southern Namibia, during the Mesoproterozoic Namaqua Oroqeny. Precambrian Res, 2013, 224: 629 doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2012.11.009
      [2] Xie M H, Zhang Q, Chen S B, et al. Extraction of alteration anomaly information by feature-based principal component analysis from ASTER data. Editorial Committe Earth Sci J China Univ Geosci, 2015, 40(8): 1381

      謝明輝, 張奇, 陳圣波, 等. 基于特征導向主成分分析遙感蝕變異常提取方法. 地球科學—中國地質大學學報, 2015, 40(8):1381
      [3] Zadeh M H, Tangestani M H, Roldan F V, et al. Sub-pixel mineral mapping of a porphyry copper belt using EO-1 Hyperion data. Adv Space Res, 2014, 53(3): 440 doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2013.11.029
      [4] Wu Z C, Ye F W, Guo F S, et al. A review on application of techniques of principle component analysis on extracting alteration information of remote sensing. J Geo-Inf Sci, 2018, 20(11): 1644 doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2018.180195

      吳志春, 葉發旺, 郭福生, 等. 主成分分析技術在遙感蝕變信息提取中的應用研究綜述. 地球信息科學學報, 2018, 20(11):1644 doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2018.180195
      [5] Liu Y Z, Lai H R, Zhang D W, et al. Change detection of high resolution remote sensing image alteration based on multi-feature mixed kernel SVM model. Remote Sens Land Resour, 2019, 31(1): 16

      劉義志, 賴華榮, 張丁旺, 等. 多特征混合核 SVM 模型的遙感影像變化檢測. 國土資源遙感, 2019, 31(1):16
      [6] He Z H, He B B. Weight spectral angle mapper (WSAM) method for hyperspectral mineral mapping. Spectrosc Spectr Anal, 2011, 31(8): 2200 doi: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2011)08-2200-05

      何中海, 何彬彬. 基于權重光譜角制圖的高光譜礦物填圖方法. 光譜學與光譜分析, 2011, 31(8):2200 doi: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2011)08-2200-05
      [7] Kaur S, Bansal R K, Mittal M, et al. Mixed pixel decomposition based on extended fuzzy clustering for single spectral value remote sensing images. J Indian Soc Remote Sens, 2019, 47(3): 427 doi: 10.1007/s12524-019-00946-2
      [8] Feng W Q, Sui H G, Tu J H, et al. Change detection method for high resolution remote sensing images using random forest. Acta Geodaet Cartograph Sin, 2017, 46(11): 1880 doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2017.20170074

      馮文卿, 眭海剛, 涂繼輝, 等. 高分辨率遙感影像的隨機森林變化檢測方法. 測繪學報, 2017, 46(11):1880 doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2017.20170074
      [9] Booysen R, Zimmermann R, Lorenz S, et al. Towards multiscale and multisource remote sensing mineral exploration using RPAS: a case study in the Lofdal carbonatite-hosted REE deposit, Namibia. Remote Sens, 2019, 11(21): 2500 doi: 10.3390/rs11212500
      [10] Cid Y D, Muller H, Platon A, et al. 3D solid texture classification using locally-oriented wavelet transforms. IEEE Trans Image Process, 2017, 26(4): 1899 doi: 10.1109/TIP.2017.2665041
      [11] Wang M, Zhang X C, Wang J Y, et al. Forest resource classification based on random forest and object oriented method. Acta Geodaet Cartograph Sin, 2020, 49(2): 235 doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2020.20190272

      王猛, 張新長, 王家耀, 等. 結合隨機森林面向對象的森林資源分類. 測繪學報, 2020, 49(2):235 doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2020.20190272
      [12] You Y F, Wang S Y, Wang B, et al. Study on hierarchical building extraction from high resolution remote sensing imagery. J Remote Sens, 2019, 23(1): 125

      游永發, 王思遠, 王斌, 等. 高分辨率遙感影像建筑物分級提取. 遙感學報, 2019, 23(1):125
      [13] Li J Y, Zhao Y K, Xue Z E, et al. A survey of model compression for deep neural networks. Chin J Eng, 2019, 41(10): 1229

      李江昀, 趙義凱, 薛卓爾, 等. 深度神經網絡模型壓縮綜述. 工程科學學報, 2019, 41(10):1229
      [14] Cracknell M J, Reading A M. Geological mapping using remote sensing data: A comparison of five machine learning algorithms, their response to variations in the spatial distribution of training data and the use of explicit spatial information. Comput Geosci, 2014, 63: 22 doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2013.10.008
      [15] Harris J. R, He J X, Rainbird R, et al. A comparison of different remotely sensed data for classifying bedrock types in Canada’s arctic: application of the robust classification method and random forests. Geosci Can, 2014, 41(4): 557
      [16] Hossain M D, Chen D M. Segmentation for object-based image analysis (OBIA): A review of algorithms and challenges from remote sensing perspective. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 2019, 150: 115 doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.02.009
      [17] Diaz G F, Ortiz J M, Silva J F, et al. Variogram-based descriptors for comparison and classification of rock texture images. Math Geosci, 2020, 52(4): 451 doi: 10.1007/s11004-019-09833-5
      [18] Zhang L, Liu Z, Ren T W, et al. Identification of seed maize fields with high spatial resolution and multiple spectral remote sensing using random forest classifier. Remote Sens, 2020, 12(3): 362 doi: 10.3390/rs12030362
      [19] Zhu J J, Fan X T, Du X P. Geometric feature representation and building extraction based on geometric features. J Appl Sci, 2015, 33(1): 9 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0255-8297.2015.01.002

      朱俊杰, 范湘濤, 杜小平. 幾何特征表達及基于幾何特征的建筑物提取. 應用科學學報, 2015, 33(1):9 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0255-8297.2015.01.002
      [20] Masoumi F, Eslamkish T, Abkar A A, et al. Integration of spectral, thermal, and textural features of ASTER data using random forests classification for lithological mapping. J Afric Earth Sci, 2017, 129: 445 doi: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2017.01.028
      [21] Pournamdari M, Hashim M, Pour A B. Spectral transformation of ASTER and Landsat TM bands for lithological mapping of Soghan ophiolite complex, South Iran. Adv Space Res, 2014, 54(4): 694 doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2014.04.022
      [22] Zhang B, He B B. Multi-scale segmentation of high-resolution remote sensing image based on improved watershed transformation. J Geo-Inf Sci, 2014, 16(1): 142

      張博, 何彬彬. 改進的分水嶺變換算法在高分辨率遙感影像多尺度分割中的應用. 地球信息科學學報, 2014, 16(1):142
    • 加載中
    圖(11) / 表(7)
    計量
    • 文章訪問數:  761
    • HTML全文瀏覽量:  459
    • PDF下載量:  27
    • 被引次數: 0
    出版歷程
    • 收稿日期:  2020-09-08
    • 網絡出版日期:  2021-01-08
    • 刊出日期:  2022-02-15

    目錄

      /

      返回文章
      返回