Explosive full-field strain and crack dynamic fracture characteristics of a linear shaped charge
-
摘要: 為了探究不同起爆位置下條形藥包全場應變以及裂紋動態斷裂特性，采用爆炸荷載動態焦散線實驗系統和數字圖像相關方法（DIC），開展了爆破模型實驗研究。研究結果表明：條形藥包一端起爆時，起爆點處翼裂紋擴展長度最小，隨著炸藥爆轟的傳播，翼裂紋擴展長度增長；中心起爆時，中心位置翼裂紋擴展長度小于兩端位置翼裂紋擴展長度，一端起爆時非起爆端翼裂紋擴展長度最長。無論中心起爆或一端起爆，條形藥包中心區域翼裂紋擴展主要為Ⅰ型裂紋，并且中心翼裂紋起裂韌度最大，端部翼裂紋為以Ⅱ型為主的Ⅰ?Ⅱ型復合裂紋。一端起爆時，拉壓應變作用范圍沿炸藥傳爆方向傳遞，且非起爆端拉壓應變作用區域大于起爆端，壓應變最大值為距起爆點約0.67 ~ 0.83倍的裝藥長度。中心起爆時，拉壓應變的作用過程沿起爆中心向兩端呈對稱形式傳播，中心點位置應變最大。兩種起爆方式下都出現端部壓應力集中現象。Abstract: This study explores the full-field strain and dynamic fracture characteristics of a linear shaped charge under different initiation positions. The explosion dynamic caustic line experiment system is employed to examine the characteristics of the blast crack propagation of the linear shaped charge at different initiation positions and capture the dynamic information of the crack tip propagation speed and stress intensity factor. Furthermore, the digital image correlation method was used to show the strain evolution law of the linear shaped charge at different initiation positions, as well as the medium strain response of the charge near the explosion zone caused due to detonation transmission. The results show that in end-initiation, the wing crack length at the initiation point is the smallest, and the wing crack propagation length increases with the detonation propagation of the explosive. Conversely, in center-initiation, the propagation length of the wing cracks at the center is less than those at both ends. The propagation length of the wing cracks in the noninitiation end is the longest for end-initiation, where the velocities of the wing crack initiation and propagation are minimum. For center-initiation, the wing crack initiation and propagation velocities are the smallest, i.e., irrespective of the initiation position, the wing crack initiation and propagation velocities at the initiation point are lower than that at other locations. Based on the dynamic stress intensity factor analysis, irrespective of the initiation position, the center wing cracks are type Ⅰ cracks with the largest crack toughness, the stress intensity factor value is the maximum, and the wing cracks at the ends are type Ⅰ?Ⅱ composite cracks dominated by type Ⅱ. Based on the full-field strain analysis of the linear shaped charge, at end-initiation, the range of tension and strain action is mainly along the direction of explosive transmission, and the tension and strain action area at the noninitiation end is larger than that at the initiation end. The corresponding position of the maximum compressive strain is 0.67–0.83 times the charge length from the initiation point. When the center detonates, the action process of tension and compression strain propagates symmetrically from the center to both ends of the initiation, and the strain at the center is the largest. The compressive stress concentration at the end occurs under both initiation modes because the explosive transmission is the process of energy accumulation; thus, the effect of the explosive explosion on the medium grows increasingly stronger along the direction of explosive transmission.
-
圖 1 透射式焦散線試驗系統光路示意圖
Figure 1. Light path of the transmissive caustics experimental system
圖 2 模型加工示意（單位：mm）. (a) 中心起爆; (b) 一端起爆
Figure 2. Schematic of the model processing (unit: mm): (a) center-initiation; (b) end-initiation
圖 3 實驗結果. (a) 中心起爆; (b) 一端起爆
Figure 3. Test results: (a) center-initiation; (b) end-initiation
圖 4 焦散斑系列圖. (a) 中心起爆; (b) 一端起爆
Figure 4. Images of a series of dynamical caustics: (a) center-initiation; (b) end-initiation
圖 5 翼裂紋位移?速度隨時間的變化曲線. (a) 中心起爆; (b) 一端起爆
Figure 5. Curves of the pre-crack displacement–velocity variation with time: (a) center-initiation; (b) end-initiation
圖 6 翼裂紋應力強度因子隨時間的變化曲線. (a) 中心起爆; (b) 一端起爆
Figure 6. Curves of the pre-crack dynamic stress intensity factor variation with time:(a) center-initiation; (b) end-initiation
圖 7 DIC基本原理示意圖
Figure 7. Sketch maps of the DIC fundamental principle before and after the speckle deformation
圖 9 模型加工示意（單位：mm）. (a) 中心起爆; (b) 一端起爆
Figure 9. Schematic of the model processing (unit: mm): (a) center-initiation; (b) end-initiation
圖 10 全場應變演化過程. (a) 中心起爆; (b) 一端起爆
Figure 10. Full-field strain evolutionary process of the specimens: (a) center-initiation; (b) end-initiation
圖 11 測點位置示意圖. (a) 中心起爆; (b) 一端起爆
Figure 11. Sketch of the gage positions: (a) center-initiation; (b) end-initiation
圖 12 測點處應變時程曲線. (a) 中心起爆; (b) 一端起爆
Figure 12. Curves of strain vs time:(a) center-initiation; (b) end-initiation
中文字幕在线观看
圖 13 測點應變峰值曲線. (a) 中心起爆; (b) 一端起爆
Figure 13. Peak strain curve of the measuring points: (a) center-initiation; (b) end-initiation
-
參考文獻
[1] Liu L Q, Katsabanis P D. A numerical study of the effects of accurate timing on rock fragmentation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 1997, 34(5): 817 doi: 10.1016/S1365-1609(96)00067-8 [2] Starfield A M, Pugliese J M. Compression waves generated in rock by cylindrical explosive charges: A comparison between a computer model and field measurements. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr, 1968, 5(1): 65 doi: 10.1016/0148-9062(68)90023-5 [3] Blair D P. Blast vibration dependence on charge length, velocity of detonation and layered media. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 2014, 65: 29 doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.11.007 [4] Gong M, Li J H. A research on stress field of column and strip-shaped charge in different detonated points. J Univ Sci Technol Beijing, 2002, 24(3): 248 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-053X.2002.03.005龔敏, 黎劍華. 延長藥包不同位置起爆時的應力場. 北京科技大學學報, 2002, 24(3):248 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-053X.2002.03.005 [5] Gong M, Wang D S, Li J H. Application of holographic interferometry to study vertical displacement field in linear charge. Explos Shock Waves, 2005, 25(3): 227 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2005.03.006龔敏, 王德勝, 黎劍華. 全息干涉法在條形藥包離面位移場研究中的應用. 爆炸與沖擊, 2005, 25(3):227 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2005.03.006 [6] Xiang W F, Shu D Q, Zhu C B. Analysis of blast stress field of linear explosive charge based on starfield superprosition method. Explos Shock Waves, 2004, 24(5): 437 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2004.05.010向文飛, 舒大強, 朱傳兵. 基于Starfield迭加法的條形藥包爆炸應力場分析. 爆炸與沖擊, 2004, 24(5):437 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2004.05.010 [7] Xiang W F, Shu D Q, Zhu C Y. Impacts of detonating mode on blast stress field of linear explosive charge. Chin J Rock Mech Eng, 2005, 24(9): 1624 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2005.09.026向文飛, 舒大強, 朱傳云. 起爆方式對條形藥包爆炸應力場的影響分析. 巖石力學與工程學報, 2005, 24(9):1624 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2005.09.026 [8] Lu W B, Zhu C Y, Lai S X, et al. Simulation of cavity expansion with strip-shaped explosive charge. Explos Shock Waves, 1996, 16(2): 171 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.1996.02.001盧文波, 朱傳云, 賴世驤, 等. 條形藥包的空腔發展過程模擬. 爆炸與沖擊, 1996, 16(2):171 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.1996.02.001 [9] Yang N H. The blasting effect at the end of a linear charge. Explos Shock Waves, 1997, 17(3): 214楊年華. 條形藥包端部效應的研究. 爆炸與沖擊, 1997, 17(3):214 [10] Chen S H, Hu S W, Chu S F. Study on the blasting vibration effect influenced by millisecond time and cylindrical charging characteristics. Chin J Rock Mech Eng, 2017, 36(Suppl 2): 3974陳士海, 胡帥偉, 初少鳳. 微差時間及柱狀裝藥特征對爆破振動效應影響研究. 巖石力學與工程學報, 2017, 36(增刊2): 3974 [11] Jiang X Y, Yan S L, Liu W, et al. Experimental analysis of the law of explosive wave of cylindrical charge. J Chongqing Univ, 2015, 38(4): 121 doi: 10.11835/j.issn.1000-582X.2015.04.017江向陽, 顏事龍, 劉偉, 等. 柱狀藥包爆炸波傳播規律的試驗分析. 重慶大學學報, 2015, 38(4):121 doi: 10.11835/j.issn.1000-582X.2015.04.017 [12] Fu H X. Analysis of in situ measurement results of tunnel's stress field induced by linear charge explosion. Rock Soil Mech, 2009, 30(2): 483 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2009.02.034傅洪賢. 條形藥包在隧道爆破中產生的應力場的實測分析. 巖土力學, 2009, 30(2):483 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2009.02.034 [13] Wei L Y, Li H C, Liu Y Z. Lateral influence rules on explosion-compacted loess embankment by linear explosive bars. Explos Shock Waves, 2018, 38(1): 233 doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0298魏連雨, 李海超, 劉艷竹. 條形藥包爆炸擠密黃土路堤橫向影響規律. 爆炸與沖擊, 2018, 38(1):233 doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0298 [14] Qu S J, Liu J F. Numerical analysis of joint angle effect on cracking with presplit blasting. Rock Soil Mech, 2015, 36(1): 189璩世杰, 劉際飛. 節理角度對預裂爆破成縫效果的影響研究. 巖土力學, 2015, 36(1):189 [15] Zhang F P, Peng J Y, Fan G H, et al. Mechanisms of blasting-induced rock fractures under different static stress and joint properties conditions. Rock Soil Mech, 2016, 37(7): 1839張鳳鵬, 彭建宇, 范光華, 等. 不同靜應力和節理條件下巖體爆破破巖機制研究. 巖土力學, 2016, 37(7):1839 [16] Yang R S, Zuo J J, Yue Z W, et al. Experimental study on opposite cracks propagation behavior under blast loading. J China Coal Soc, 2017, 42(5): 1093楊仁樹, 左進京, 岳中文, 等. 爆炸載荷作用下相向裂紋擴展行為的實驗研究. 煤炭學報, 2017, 42(5):1093 [17] Kalthoff J F. The Shadow Optical Method of Caustics. Vienna: Springer, 1986 [18] Chu T C, Ranson W F, Sutton M A. Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics. Exp Mech, 1985, 25(3): 232 doi: 10.1007/BF02325092 [19] Sabaté N, Vogel D, Gollhardt A, et al. Digital image correlation of nanoscale deformation fields for local stress measurement in thin films. Nanotechnology, 2006, 17(20): 5264 doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/17/20/037 -
下載:
點擊查看大圖
計量
- 文章訪問數: 438
- HTML全文瀏覽量: 166
- PDF下載量: 53
- 被引次數: 0
